On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Philip Guenther wrote:
>While the FETCH request seems pointless**, it matches the syntax.
>Binc's response fails to do so: the list after HEADER.FIELDS must
>contain at least one atom or string:
A valid response would have been this, in other words:
00000008 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS ("")]
* 1 FETCH (BODY[HEADER.FIELDS ("")] {2}
)
00000008 OK FETCH completed
...although I really wonder what the interpretation of the header field ""
is. Something is making Pine behave funny (Mark?) in any case; a bug
probably.
With this response, the server is stating that there is no "" header, it
seems quite acceptable wrt to protocol, and it's gigo.
Cyrus IMAP says:
3 fetch 1 body[header.fields ("")]
3 BAD Invalid field-name in Fetch BODY[HEADER.FIELDS
Andreas
--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen
http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg2
