On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:26:43PM +0200, Davide Alberani wrote:
...
> > I'm also open minded to to write a little benchmark, for checking
> > both approaches, which is the more promising one.
>
> I think there will be a lot to test, in the future; I fear that
> the switch to SQLObject and the support for tv series episodes
> will increase the time needed to run the imdbpy2sql.py script
> by a factor of 2 (or 3 or 4 or - True Phear(tm)! - 5 or 6).
> On the other side, I think that at _usage_ time, performances
> won't be greatly affected (maybe no more than 1.2x or 1.5x)
...
Just my 2c:
The usage performance is more important, isn't it?
About the imdbpy2sql performance it seems that the real bottleneck is the
SQL execution. If we can buffer a good parto of the plain text file being read
we can defer the SQL execution to a separate thread or process. This should
be a good improvement. But first we have to end the work on imdbpy2sql.
--
Giuseppe "Cowo" Corbelli ~\/~ My software: http://cowo.yoda2000.net
-<! A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking. !>-
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Imdbpy-devel mailing list
Imdbpy-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/imdbpy-devel
