On Jul 21, "H. Turgut Uyar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is (b) we want, then practically the 'single' specification > is unnecessary at the moment.
Noticed. :-) I was still reasoning thinking at the first implementations of parse_dom, I fear. > Because there will be only one element in the resulting list and > joining it using the empty string will produce the same result > anyway. Right. And, if I'm not wrong, specifying 'multi' will ensure that we always get a list, even when there's only one element returned. > > will show the differences between old and new parsers. > > That's great. Is there a shortcut for executing a specific test > directly? Sure; first of all, run the build_tests.py script; this will populate the standalone.old/ and standalone.new/ directories with scripts useful to run single tests. Oh, I've forgot to link the 'utils.py' module inside these directory. In the last hours I've committed some fixed for searches (now "direct hits" are handled) -- Davide Alberani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [PGP KeyID: 0x465BFD47] http://erlug.linux.it/~da/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Imdbpy-devel mailing list Imdbpy-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/imdbpy-devel
