> >Anyone here ever offload their IMail logging to a *NIX box? > > sorry, I was thinking syslogd logging. > > I don't know if Imail does heavy buffering like syslogd does. > > but again, it looks like your after disk i/o bottleneck and two disks is a > good bet.
That is what I was thinking. The system is running RAID5, but might as well offload as much as possible. I remember seeing a thing in one of the option packs for NT that owuld also het you offload the NT logs to a Syslog server. Might be interesting to see what offloading all the logs on the IMail machine to a syslog server would do. --Eric
