thats called BackLog www.intersectalliance.com i use that as well, you just tell it the host syslog server ip addy and hit go basically, and all your logging goes to the supplied syslog server, it also has the option of setting it to log as tab,comma, or other delimiter. its fairly decent imo, i quit using it myself due to the volume of messages it was throwing at my syslog then forwarding to my sql server, so it just wasnt right for me on that one, u might like it tho, just then send imail to the same syslog server, dont forget to set every service to log to syslog instead of the logfile.
don > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cybertime Hostmaster > >Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 3:01 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [IMGate] Re: Logging > > > > > > > >> >Anyone here ever offload their IMail logging to a *NIX box? > >> > >> sorry, I was thinking syslogd logging. > >> > >> I don't know if Imail does heavy buffering like syslogd does. > >> > >> but again, it looks like your after disk i/o bottleneck and > >two disks is a > >> good bet. > > > >That is what I was thinking. The system is running RAID5, but > >might as well > >offload as much as possible. > > > >I remember seeing a thing in one of the option packs for NT that > >owuld also > >het you offload the NT logs to a Syslog server. > > > >Might be interesting to see what offloading all the logs on the IMail > >machine to a syslog server would do. > > > >--Eric > > > > > >
