I was running NT4 with SP6 as well.... The issue was a pain in the ass as you did not know unless you were using DNS or someone called....
attached is an in-addr file as well as my main doman file (minimized due to repetition.) hope it helps... On Tuesday, December 31, 2002 10:56 AM, Austin Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Thanks Bob >We're nt4 SP6 >I can get BIND going but when i add zone files, I apparently f*ck 'em up >well > >Any zone files I can sample??? > >Thanks & Happy New year >-A > > -----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >On Behalf Of Bob McGregor >Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:38 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [IMGate] Re: non RTFM IMGATE & NT BIND Qstns > > >Austin I was running Bind 9.2.2 on NT and changed to the Linux version as = >there is an issue with 9.2.2 that they are aware of that bind stops = >responding on the UDP port for some reason. There is no failure in Bind (= >does not stop) and no event logs are produced. > >here's a brief snippet from my conversation with Danny Mayer the guru on = >NT Bind: > >> >Are you running NT 4.0 or W2K? There is a problem in W2K which causes >> >it to stop responding on a UDP socket. This is due to a Microsoft bug >> >that they introduced in W2K in the protocol. There is a workaround for = >it >> >in SP2, but it also requires code changes to BIND, instead of their = >just=20 >> fixing >> >the underlying bug. There is a fix for this in BIND 9.3.0. >> > >> >Danny >> > >> >>thanks Danny, >> >>I'm running on 4.0 sp6. Where do I get 9.3.0 for NT? Do you think it = >will >>fix my problem? > >You can't. It's still under development. I don't know the timetable for=20 >release. >It should fix your problem. > > >Also, I'm not sure you want to solve it with DNS. Don't you want all = >inbound mail to go through your IMgate and then get passed to >IMail? > >hope this helps... bob > >On Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Good Morning IMGate List. >> >>This is Austin. Me & my number one gun, have swung the CEO on purchasing = >us >>IMail in leui (sp?) of Exchange. Len and Don offered some help on the = >learning >>curve, and we're grateful. >>It doesnt look like it will be too bad. >> >>BUT >>I just dl'd ISC Bind 9.2 for NT. >>b/c we couldn't mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>instead we could only mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>I may be wrong but I told her we could fix this with a cname in BIND. Am = >I >>right/wrong? >>I dont want end users mailing to the hosts FQDN, just the >>domain name. >> >>Also if ANYONE has a smattering of DNS files for NT that I can look at = >for >>their domain, I'll FedEx them doughnuts. >> >>Was up past midnight last night, googling "bind" + "nt" + >>"tutorial" >> >>May as well have been running it on Linux for what came back >>Did fine until I started making the forward and reverse zones. Then down = >in >>flames. Anyone with working configs (not the core files the zone files) = >that >>they dont feel are a risk to share with me, I sure would love >>you for it. >> >>Thanks >>Probably best to mail me at work or my coworker >> >>Thanks to ALL, (I dont think this is RTFM) >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Take Care & Happy New Year to all of you >>-A >> >> >> > > > > -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- -- Type: application/octet-stream -- File: db.207.196.133.external.txt -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- -- Type: application/octet-stream -- File: db.gfps.k12.mt.us.external.txt
