Bob
Have chosen to run a lot of Bind on the IMGate boxes. Wanted to run 'em on
Linux but dont have any backup tech skills on *nix when I'm out of the office,
so Bind on NT is the ticket while my techs get more experience.

Did you forget to throw in the attachments?
Didnt see any.

Got my forward zone started am now trying to figure out reverse zones.

Any samples are appreciatted

Wishing you a good new year
-A


On 31 Dec 2002 11:19:53 -0700 Bob McGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I was running NT4 with SP6 as well.... The
> issue was a pain in the ass as you did not know
> unless you were using DNS or someone called....
> 
> attached is an in-addr file as well as my main
> doman file (minimized due to repetition.)
> 
> hope it helps...
> 
> On Tuesday, December 31, 2002 10:56 AM, Austin
> Mann  wrote:
> >
> >Thanks Bob
> >We're nt4 SP6
> >I can get BIND going but when i add zone
> files, I apparently f*ck 'em up
> >well
> >
> >Any zone files I can sample???
> >
> >Thanks & Happy New year
> >-A
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >From:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >On Behalf Of Bob McGregor
> >Sent:        Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:38 AM
> >To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject:     [IMGate] Re: non RTFM IMGATE & NT
> BIND Qstns
> >
> >
> >Austin I was running Bind 9.2.2 on NT and
> changed to the Linux version as =
> >there is an issue with 9.2.2 that they are
> aware of that bind stops =
> >responding on the UDP port for some reason. 
> There is no failure in Bind (=
> >does not stop) and no event logs are produced.
> >
> >here's a brief snippet from my conversation
> with Danny Mayer the guru on =
> >NT Bind:
> >
> >> >Are you running NT 4.0 or W2K? There is a
> problem in W2K which causes
> >> >it to stop responding on a UDP socket. This
> is due to a Microsoft bug
> >> >that they introduced in W2K in the
> protocol. There is a workaround for =
> >it
> >> >in SP2, but it also requires code changes
> to BIND, instead of their =
> >just=20
> >> fixing
> >> >the underlying bug.  There is a fix for
> this in BIND 9.3.0.
> >> >
> >> >Danny
> >> >
> >>
> >>thanks Danny,
> >>
> >>I'm running on 4.0 sp6.  Where do I get 9.3.0
> for NT?  Do you think it =
> >will
> >>fix my problem?
> >
> >You can't. It's still under development. I
> don't know the timetable for=20
> >release.
> >It should fix your problem.
> >
> >
> >Also, I'm not sure you want to solve it with
> DNS. Don't you want all =
> >inbound mail to go through your IMgate and
> then get passed to
> >IMail?
> >
> >hope this helps... bob
> >
> >On Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:23 AM,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>Good Morning IMGate List.
> >>
> >>This is Austin. Me & my number one gun, have
> swung the CEO on purchasing =
> >us
> >>IMail in leui (sp?) of Exchange. Len and Don
> offered some help on the =
> >learning
> >>curve, and we're grateful.
> >>It doesnt look like it will be too bad.
> >>
> >>BUT
> >>I just dl'd ISC Bind 9.2 for NT.
> >>b/c we couldn't mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>instead we could only mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>I may be wrong but I told her we could fix
> this with a cname in BIND. Am =
> >I
> >>right/wrong?
> >>I dont want end users mailing to the hosts
> FQDN, just the
> >>domain name.
> >>
> >>Also if ANYONE has a smattering of DNS files
> for NT that I can look at =
> >for
> >>their domain, I'll FedEx them doughnuts.
> >>
> >>Was up past midnight last night, googling
> "bind" + "nt" +
> >>"tutorial"
> >>
> >>May as well have been running it on Linux for
> what came back
> >>Did fine until I started making the forward
> and reverse zones. Then down =
> >in
> >>flames. Anyone with working configs (not the
> core files the zone files) =
> >that
> >>they dont feel are a risk to share with me, I
> sure would love
> >>you for it.
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>Probably best to mail me at work or my
> coworker
> >>
> >>Thanks to ALL, (I dont think this is RTFM)
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>Take Care & Happy New Year to all of you
> >>-A
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar
> --
> -- Type: application/octet-stream
> -- File: db.207.196.133.external.txt
> 
> 
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar
> --
> -- Type: application/octet-stream
> -- File: db.gfps.k12.mt.us.external.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to