>Yeah and since I'm a non profit I deal with these weenies and STILL say most >DHCP MTAs are spam, I'll run the check but I need a whitelist way around it >somehow.
the mta_clients_dul.map is whitelisted by mta_clients_bw.map. there's no need for a new approach for whitelisting. >Cant circumvent/whitelist a header check, no? I'm not talking about a header_checks, the DUL blocking is mta_clients, not header checks. Len
