>Remember last year, we also had a thread about some company that was >selling copyrighted strings as "header signatures" to put your X- headers >so compliant MTA's could refuse the mail for such a domain if the headers >did not contain domain.com's "signature". > >If the headers DID contain the copyrighted string but it was forged by a >spammer, then existing international copyright laws could be used as a >basis for legal pursuit of copyright violation. This was a beautiful, >lightweight piggybacking of UCE defense on current, existing international >legal infrastructure. What happened to it? > >domain.com <copyright string>
Are you talking about Habeas? If so, they are still around: www.habeas.com Bill
