>I just got IMGate running on a test box using Red Hat thanks to the easy to
>follow instructions in the read me :-)

good, RTFM works again  :)

>I was wondering if message weighting/scoring could be done with postfix /
>IMGate?

not with IMGate basic or advanced, which is oriented to rejection based on 
envelope information in the SMTP dialog, before the DATA (content) is 
received, so maximum bandwidth is conserverd. postfix has non-weighted, 
regex content-scanning for the msgs that aren't rejected.

weighting and heurisitics are mostly content-scanning systems, they use the 
envelope information + the entire message body to evaluate.  So you must 
receive the entire message for them to be effective.

>I havn't found alot of good information on this and the stuff I did
>find, I don't quite grasp.

see vipul's razor, spamassassin, Message Sniffer (commercial and very 
good), etc, etc.

Running these as postfix content-filters AFTER IMGate's other filtering 
should work fine, since 90++ % of msgs passed to the content-filter will be 
legit.  So the content-filter will be trying to catch the few messages that 
IMGate doesn't.

I have asked in the IMail forum twice and got no response: I would like 
people who are running Imail+junkmakil AFTER IMGate to tell us how many 
rejects/day by IMgate, and by junkmail.

and even better, the Junks rejects/day before IMGAte was installed, and the 
Junkmail rejects/day after IMGate was installed.

Nobody has answered yet.

I would also like to work up some scripts for junkmail logs that harvest 
junkmail rejects and email the ip's, PTR's, email addresses to IMGate for 
incorporation in IMGate filtering.

I want to do the same with MadScientist's Message Sniffer.

The objective is to convert the expensive content-scan rejects to the more 
efficient envelope-stage rejects.   That is, "feed forward" from the 
back-end content-scanner to the IMGate front-end envelope-filtering.

>I dont' trust some of the RBL's completely

They aren't that effective anyway, they help, but don't predominate. there 
is no single silver bullet.

Len



Reply via email to