>I have been using the old Imgate configuration for awhile now with good >luck.
luck??? "with good results" > I'm wondering whether it is worth re-doing the box and using the >new PCRE stuff. you don't have to re-do the box, just install the pcre lib, recompile postfix "HASPCRE", "postfix upgrade" > Is it? yes, pcre is a lot fastet than posix > And if it is, are there some instructions >somewhere about this configuration like Len already has for the "old" >configuration. Thanks for all your help!=20 /bin/sh mkdir /usr/local/src cd /usr/local/src ftp ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/pcre-3.9.tar.gz #wget ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/pcre-3.9.tar.gz tar -xvzf pcre-3.9.tar.gz cd /usr/local/src/pcre-3.9 ./configure make make install exit 0 and then in the postfix directory, wraps: make -f Makefile.init makefiles "CCARGS=-DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/local/include" "AUXLIBS=-L/usr/local/lib -lpcre" make make upgrade Len
