Isn't this a reverse lookup problem?

> host 64.37.249.101
101.249.37.64.IN-ADDR.ARPA is a nickname for 101.0/25.249.37.64.IN-ADDR.ARPA
101.0/25.249.37.64.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer host101.covisint.com
> host host101.covisint.com
Host not found.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Serhan Sevim " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: [IMGate] Re: warning message


>
> It's just there is no Host record exist in the remote DNS server for that
particular MX record., that the reason it returns Host not found.
> If you try to ping it, say host101.covisint.com you'll get no reply to
give an example.
> Email always gets thru but I doubt if it is againsts RFC rules or not.
> PS : This is not related to reverse lookup.
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Kenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date:  Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:40:19 -0600
>
> >
> >I've seen similar threads in the archives, but didn't see one that would
> >answer my question.
> >Here is what I see in the maillog.
> >
> >Mar 19 07:56:49 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62724]: warning: 64.37.249.101:
> >hostname host101.covisint.com verification failed: Host not found
> >
> >Mar 19 07:56:49 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62724]: connect from
> >unknown[64.37.249.101]
> >Mar 19 07:56:49 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62724]: B39E45A8:
> >client=unknown[64.37.249.101]
> >Mar 19 07:56:54 mailgate postfix/cleanup[62736]: B39E45A8:
> >message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Mar 19 07:56:54 mailgate postfix/qmgr[31202]: B39E45A8:
> >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=1523, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> >Mar 19 07:56:54 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62724]: disconnect from
> >unknown[64.37.249.101]
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate ravpostfix[62771]: data received... begin
> >scanning...
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate ravpostfix[62771]: scanning returns OK...
sending
> >file...
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62730]: connect from
> >localhost[127.0.0.1]
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62730]: 3BBC8591:
> >client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/cleanup[62725]: 3BBC8591:
> >message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/smtpd[62730]: disconnect from
> >localhost[127.0.0.1]
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/smtp[62731]: B39E45A8:
> >to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=9,
> >status=status=sent (250 Ok)
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/qmgr[31202]: 3BBC8591:
> >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=1695, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> >Mar 19 07:56:58 mailgate postfix/smtp[62727]: 3BBC8591:
> >to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=10.25.1.6[10.25.1.6], delay=0, status=sent
> >(250 Message queued)
> >
> >I thought that if the reverse lookup fail, it was suppose to reject the
> >E-mail?
> >Why did the message go thru? is it because it's a warning and not a
reject
> >or error message?
> >
> >thanks.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to