So are you saying i should remove osirusoft then ... or is it okay now?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: [IMGate] Re: The bad side of RBL


>
> Yea I did the same thing too.
> I noticed it earlier but tought that it would come back up, but it never
did
> and it did cause alot of rejects.
> Once I removed them, everyting worked fine again.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:35 AM
> Subject: [IMGate] The bad side of RBL
>
>
> >
> > When a RBL server your postfix is using goes off-line, postfix will
> > continue to query it, taking a lot longer, 10s of seconds, to accept
each
> > incoming mail.   Each SMTPD process lasts a lot longer and so if you hit
> > the default max of 50 SMTPD processes, incoming mail will be refused.
> >
> > I had call yesterday from an IMGate user who said his mail volumes were
> way
> > down.  The problem was osirusoft being unreachable.  I removed osirusoft
> > from his smtpd restrictions about 19:00 and look at the results:
> >
> > Per-Hour Traffic Summary
> >      time          received  delivered   deferred    bounced
rejected
>
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >      0000-0100        2117        393          9          4       1353
> >      0100-0200        2216        431         13          2       1400
> >      0200-0300        2220        263          5          2       1420
> >      0300-0400        2303        235          3          1       1486
> >      0400-0500        2261        237          3          0       1428
> >      0500-0600        1867        226          3          2       1023
> >      0600-0700        1813        321          1          2        857
> >      0700-0800        1732        504          2          1        644
> >      0800-0900        1788        459          7          3        692
> >      0900-1000        1941        623          6          2        695
> >      1000-1100        1835        749         14          5        494
> >      1100-1200        2005        910         27          3        563
> >      1200-1300        2162       1158         24          6        571
> >      1300-1400        1810        655         27          5        605
> >      1400-1500        1799        554         11          2        623
> >      1500-1600        1997        667         17          6        674
> >      1600-1700        1963        552        194          4        747
> >      1700-1800        2091        616         19          1        830
> >      1800-1900        1927        589         28          3        696
> >      1900-2000        1891        793         22          1        578
> >      2000-2100        7136       3271       4204          3
> > 4036<osirus removed
> >      2100-2200        7918       3841        383         13       5083
> >      2200-2300        6491       2117         33          4       4886
> >      2300-2400        6310       1324         18          5       5769
> >
> > postfix opened up again to full speed, both for accepting and delivering
> > messages as well as rejecting messages.
> >
> > ( the huge number of deferrals 4200 had nothing to do with the osirus
RBL,
> > but his IMGate was also screwed up and giving a lot of "connection
> refused"
> > to IMGate, so the I was repeatedly flush the queue as he tried to get
> IMail
> > to behave. )
> >
> > For low-volume servers, a dead RBL is no big deal, but for higher volume
> > IMGates, it can really restrict.
> >
> > I guess I need to work on some maillog scripts that monitor deferrals to
> > the mail box server (Imail not accepting mail) and monitor failures to
> > lookup RBL servers.
> >
> > Len
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to