Didnt you also say there was a way to keep pflogsum from reading the = extra info in the reject by using a ; or , ?
-----Original Message----- From: SWIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMGate] Re: pcre I got ti to work. But what I had to do was a whole postfix update to 2.0.15. I d/l the pcre 4.3 and did its thing. then with PF 1.1.2 tried to get pcre to work and nada. so d/l PF 2.0.15 and did its diddy and now I got pcre. now to get all the files edited. No idea on why it wouldn't work but I do greatly appreciate the help and advice. Mark ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Cybertime Hostmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: [IMGate] Re: pcre > > Here try: > make tidy > > Then continue on as below. > > > Readin the PCRE_README: > > DID this: > > make -f Makefile.init makefiles \ > > "CCARGS=3D-DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/local/include" \ > > "AUXLIBS=3D-L/usr/local/lib -lpcre" > > GOT THIS: > > bah. TMI > > > Then I did : > > make (is this considered recompiling ?) > > then did : > > postfix stop > > then did : > > make upgrade > > then did : > > postfix start > > NO ERRORS on screen or in maillog or messages. Test message from my > yahoo > > accounts arrives and is delivered. >
