On Monday, September 22, 2003, 18:39:28, Peter Param wrote:
> But it appears that the RFC allows it (I must be missing
> something!)...This is what the RFC says:
> 4.1.1.1 Extended HELLO (EHLO) or HELLO (HELO)
> ... The argument field contains the fully-qualified domain name of
> the SMTP client if one is available. In situations in which the SMTP
> client system does not have a meaningful domain name (e.g., when its
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> address is dynamically allocated and no reverse mapping record is
> available), ...
Show me a legitimate e-mail server that doesn't have a meaningful domain
name.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any sufficiently advanced bug is
Rod Dorman indistinguishable from a feature
