Because I am seeing the subject that got blocked. Herbalife is indeed one of our major clients, and this is a reply to one of my CSR's. But either way, in this case is the subject not: " R: Questions on your documents" ?
Here are another two that make no sense: Maybe it is the word "Documents", but it is not in that line of the regexp check. Oh wait, I see it! It is the word "cum" in the word documents. Oct 31 09:05:36 gate3 postfix/cleanup[61988]: 0788A1022B: reject: header Subject: RE: [ FWD:Revised Contract Documents ] from mail.tritel.com[63.226.107.195]; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=<[192.168.10.253]>: 554 ACL 5 This Message Content was REJECTED! Oct 31 09:43:29 gate3 postfix/cleanup[62079]: 16A6910223: reject: header Subject: Missionary Documents from mail.gmhwh.org[12.110.19.37]; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=<mail.gmhwh.org>: 554 ACL 5 This Message Content was REJECTED! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMGate] Re: header checks problem >But they were not in the subject. how can you be sure? >cat /var/log/maillog | grep "REJECTED!" > >Oct 31 08:02:40 gate3 postfix/cleanup[61867]: E58F11022B: reject: header >Subject: R: Questions on your documents from >63-193-81-202.ded.pacbell.net[63.193.81.202]; >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> herbalife sure sounds like somebody pushing drugs or their "natural" equivalents. Len -- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.193 / Virus Database: 260.2.5 - Release Date: 10/31/2003 -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.193 / Virus Database: 260.2.5 - Release Date: 10/31/2003
