M.D. DeWar wrote: > I hate these filters. > I got on the SNORT mailing list. (if anyone uses it and can answer a queston > on why my msyql db stop updating be great) > but any way sent a message to the list and I get this back to me. > ARGH > (as bad as the ding dongs that put vacation messages on their lists email > boxes) > > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. > > Place = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ; > Sender = M.D. DeWar > Subject = [Snort-users] database not getting updated > Delivery Time = November 17, 2003 (Monday) 12:04:30 > Policy = Dirty Words
A pig fell in the mud? > Action on this mail = Quarantine message > > Warning message from administrator: > Notice: A message you sent appears to have violated GE Financial Assurance > email policies for inappropriate language or content and may not have been > received by the recipient. "may not have been received". So they don't even know what their policy does with the message? > > I guess SNORT is a dirty word. > *sigh* > Mark body filter: /Trend SMEX Content Filter/ REJECT Trend SUX Content Filter rejection ;-) Seriously though, look to see if SUX adds a custom header which you could reject in header checks if desired. The body check is an expensive one and probably not worth the hassle. -- Chris Scott Host Orlando, Inc http://www.hostorlando.com/
