> >Second, you will see how overkill the reject_*_hostname settings are > >without loss of mail. > > huh?
Aaah, I see. I missed a comma. "settings are, without loss of mail." or "Without loss of mail you can..." would have made more sense. --Eric
> >Second, you will see how overkill the reject_*_hostname settings are > >without loss of mail. > > huh?
Aaah, I see. I missed a comma. "settings are, without loss of mail." or "Without loss of mail you can..." would have made more sense. --Eric