----- Original Message ----- From: "Cybertime Hostmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Note the last two words: "particular sender", not recipient. Hence, my > > script addresses his question and works just fine in this scenario. > > Then reply to that persons message, not Keith Woodworth's or mine, both > of which show a script that does more. I didn't reply to you, I replied to Keith's message (try following the thread before replying). > The cleanq that Keith noted is one of two things, a custom one, or the one > by Mark Davis and Craig Sanders. Without knowing what his script does, > there is no way I can say whether he was stating it did the same thing as > the man postsuper example or not. But the fact remains that the man > postsuper example is a very versatile one, and does more than what was > requested. So you reply without knowledge of what the script Keith presented even does. Again, my reply was to Andrew's original post and a response to the cleanq script presented by Keith. You are the one the that jump in without understanding the progress of the thread and made some knee-jerk response about the script I present being flawed. Beware of that "foot-in-mouth" syndrome you are occasionally suseptable to. Bill
