On 2010-07-10 10:57, Štěpán Němec wrote: > While I understand what the change was supposed to do, I don't > really understand *why* you did it. Vegard? Does it solve any > problems or bring any actual advantages?
I added it on the basis on an e-mail I received about C-i conflicting with the use of <tab> as a completion key. (This is quite popular, judging by http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/TabCompletion and the storm of blog posts retrieved by Google.) However, binding C-i in vi state shouldn't affect the binding of <tab> in Insert state -- it would only be a problem if you for some reason complete words in vi state. Evidently, some people do, as I did receive a confirmation that my change fixed the problem. -- Vegard _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
