On 2010-07-23 15:18, Štěpán Němec wrote: > Vimpulse uses remapping at a few places so I thought I'd mention > that, as AFAIK Vegard tries to keep things XEmacs-compatible (and > has my full moral support ;-D).
Yeah, I'm aware that XEmacs lacks remapping. The `vimpulse-remap' macro tries to make do by storing remappings in an association list, whence they can be retrieved by a specific function like `vimpulse-operator-remapping'. There is no general solution. > I'd love to be using XEmacs (see the recent copyright thread on this > list), but it seems to only work reasonably well out-of-the-box in > the terminal for me. Are there any technical advantages to using XEmacs nowadays? -- Vegard _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
