Nick Smallbone <[email protected]> writes: > Štěpán Němec <[email protected]> writes: >> Is the `characterp' -> `integerp' change really necessary? On XEmacs, >> (integerp ?\C-0) => nil, although the integer <--> character arithmetic >> (`-', `logand') works the same as in GNU Emacs. > > On GNU Emacs it's the other way round: (characterp ?\C-0) => nil, but > (integerp ?\C-0) => t. What if we changed it to use > (or (characterp char) (integerp char)) instead?
Sounds good. Any reason not to do that, Vegard? _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
