On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:18:35PM +0200, Štěpán Němec wrote: > Vegard Øye <[email protected]> writes: > > > On 2010-09-27 13:41, Štěpán Němec wrote: > >> OTOH, we should just definitively remove the big file support. > > > > Why? The big file is much easier to distribute. > > We've discussed that before already. It makes no sense to be trying to > support both. `make big' is just a hack. If you want a single file, > develop with a single file. If you want multiple files, distribute > multiple files. > > Štěpán
FWIW, as a consumer of vimpulse, I like the single file. Makes it easier to transfer around. Also, for those of us who use version control to track and distribute our individual Emacs configs, a single file means that when we upgrade the vimpulse package we don't have to worry about vimpulse-foo.el having been renamed to vimpusle-bar.el. It's just a straight copy.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
