To me, :q should be bind to C-x C-c with emacsclient...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 at 11:56:03 +0100, guivho wrote: > Hi Titus > >> When coming from Vim, you're used to have many Vim instances which you > > I'm coming from Vim (MacVim now, but on Ubuntu before, and before that > on MS*) and I used to have a gvim window that I used for all my edits, > using tab and window combinations and remote-silent-tab stuff etc. > > So I seldom did quit the Vim session, only buffers within it. > >> often quit. When working with Vimpulse and emacsclient, you have one >> emacs instance instead and the pattern to use :q to close files >> doesn't make much sense anymore. But I'd prefer to learn using :bd or >> C-x # over redefining :q to mean something else than quit. >> >> Apart from that, if :q kills only a client, what would you use to quit emacs? > > Who wants to quit emacs as a common task. Isn't this the thingie that > yoou start automatically and stays alive for all your editing, > directory browsing, eshelling etc... > > I rarely quit Emacs, but I frequently want to save and quit a buffer, > so I prefer the viper way to do this in one sinle :wq command and I do > think that it would be nice of this was combined with server-edit > so that I even don't need to think about quitting differently if I am > editing as a client to e.g. my gmail. > > I wouldn't mind to use C-x C-c to quit emacs on the rare occasions > that I want to quit emacs. > > Guivho. > > _______________________________________________ > implementations-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list -- Félix
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
