On 2011-03-01 18:41 +0100, Tim Harper wrote: > Perhaps it's just me, but if it's a choice between interoperability > with Emacs at the cost of 97% compatibility with vim, and 100% > compatibility with them at the cost of reduced interoperability with > Emacs commands, I would prefer sacrificing the vim compatibility. > If 100% vim compatibility were important to me, I would use vim.
Well put. I totally agree. -- Vegard _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
