On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Michael Markert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 Aug 2011, York Zhao wrote: > >> I believe ediff-mode should be in emacs state. > > I think so, too. > > And here are some more: (...)
Shouldn't this be done the other way around? I mean - wouldn't a list of modes in normal state (with emacs state being the default) make more sense than a list of modes *not* in normal state? Cheers, -- José A. Romero L. escherdragon at gmail "We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals." (Quarry worker's creed) _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
