On 2011-08-20 00:26 +0200, Michael Markert wrote:
> (evil-define-keys 'motion speedbar-key-map "h" 'backward-char
> "j" 'speedbar-next
> "k" 'speedbar-prev
> "l" 'forward-char
> ...)
>
> Is it worth to include it? And if, is it worth to keep the single
> key functions?
I would just add a &rest parameter to the current function,
`evil-define-key'. That makes it similar to `setq': you can specify
multiple sets of arguments if you want to, or you can just use it
in the same way as the standard function `define-key'.
Note that Emacs won't indent the code like above. You have to break
it up before the first of the bindings in order for them to line up:
(evil-define-keys 'motion speedbar-key-map
"h" 'backward-char
"j" 'speedbar-next
"k" 'speedbar-prev
"l" 'forward-char
...)
--
Vegard
_______________________________________________
implementations-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
