On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Michael Markert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 Dec 2011, Titus von der Malsburg wrote: > Neither, it's a wrong expectation ;) Vim does not do it as well.
Hm, not sure I agree. As far as I know Vim doesn't have something analogous to visual-line-mode (:set wrap is not quite the same). Therefore, I would say that it's not entirely clear what the authentic Vim behavior should be under visual-line-mode. My understanding of visual-line-mode is that visual lines should have largely the same semantics as buffer-lines have when visual-line-mode is switched off. That is, even if something is just one line in the underlying file, it should look & feel like several real lines in Emacs if it doesn't fit on one line visually. Hence, I would argue that a visual lines should behave like a buffer line in Evil, which means that j, k, <up>, <down> should move to the next visual line and not to the next buffer line. Titus _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
