Cool! Thanks :) > This is at least not easy to achieve.
Then is ok as it is definitely not must-have feature :) And thank you for detail explanation. Regards, Sanel On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Frank Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:49:42PM +0100, Sanel Zukan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here is patch for sorted buffer names when ':ls" was given. I often >> use this command and when you have a bit of loaded files with various >> additional modes that opens own buffers, things becomes quite messy. >> >> This patch will apply sort on buffer names, so hidden buffers (those >> with " *xxx*") will be put first, then modes specific buffers (e.g. >> "*xxx*") and then goes files/directories. > > Thanks, applied in 1689501f. > >> One nice feature would be numbering buffers, just like Vim does, so >> each buffer can be opened with ":b<n>". What do you guys think about >> it? > > This is at least not easy to achieve. The problem is that Emacs does > not (AFAIK) assign unique numbers to the buffers. Instead Emacs > manages a buffer-list which is rearranged each time some buffer gets > active (it is moved to the front of this list). Therefore there is no > standard way to identify buffers by number. > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > implementations-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
