On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Vegard Øye <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-08-01 10:23 +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > >> I might not have made it clear before, but there’s a clear difference >> when running the version just before CJK support was added and running >> the version just after CJK support was added. > > Okay, one more test, then. In the definition of `evil-move-word' in > evil-commands.el, comment out the call to `evil-move-word-cjk'. > Does this restore the old responsiveness? If so, then that's the > function we need to optimize.
Yes, that solved it. _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
