> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:01:42 +0200 > From: Frank Fischer <[email protected]> > > Could you please provide an example how it confuses Emacs? The autoload > cookie is defined as it is by intention (except that the > interactive-mark (fourth argument to autoload) is missing), i.e. the > function and the cookie are defined in evil-core.el but the file to be > loaded is evil.el. I'm using package.el and I did not observe any > problems with that. The autoload file `evil-autoload.el' is generated > and used correctly.
Hi, Frank. Of course, writing "Emacs is confused" should have been a reminder that in fact *I* was confused. The missing interactive mark threw me because I couldn't M-x evil-mode. Not sure why my after-init-hook wasn't working at the time, but this morning it's loading correctly. Sorry for the mailing list noise; at least I learned something. Trevor _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
