Hi Sanel, On 3 September 2012 10:04, Sanel Zukan <[email protected]> wrote: > AFAIK this is how vim behaves. Also, the buffer is not deleted, only window > where that buffer is shown (the same as in vim).
Thanks for the info. I like to keep the window, and now happily use the redefined commands suggested by Titus. Kind regards, Guido > > Regards, > Sanel > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Guido Van Hoecke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I usualy have a 2x2 window configuration for my Emacs frame. >> My evil-version is 0.1 and my emacs is >> GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) >> of 2012-08-27 on bob.porkrind.org >> >> Anybody has an idea why :q or :wq not only gets rid of the buffer, but >> also of the window? >> >> Editing a file in window 2 with following configuration >> >> -1- -2- >> -3- -4- >> >> and doing :q in -2- I end up with configuration >> >> ---1--- >> -3- -4- >> >> This is rather annoying. >> >> Any pointers? >> >> TIA, >> >> >> Guido >> >> -- >> No one knows like a woman how to say >> things that are at once gentle and deep. >> -- Hugo >> >> http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> implementations-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list > > _______________________________________________ > implementations-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
