Also being discussed on /r/vim: http://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/18mky1/evil_a_nearly_complete_vim_implementation_in_emacs/
martin On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Sanel Zukan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:49:56PM +0000, Frank Fischer wrote: >> I've never thought about something like this. Feel free to announce >> whereever you think it's appropriate ;) > > Evil got slashdotted :D > (http://developers.slashdot.org/story/13/02/16/0251239/evil-almost-full-vim-implementation-in-emacs-reaches-10) > >> Sure. But I think it could be quite challenging depending on what you >> want to achieve. Simply make :set VAR=VALUE an alternative to (setq >> VAR VALUE) should not be too difficult. But this would only work for >> Emacs variables. If you want give appropriate mappings of Vim variable >> names to Emacs settings, then this is probably much more difficult. In >> particular, because not every Vim setting has a direct counterpart but >> may need several adjustments. But I think it would be a nice feature >> to have ... ;) > > I'm planning at the beginning to implement simple mappings, (:set > VAR=VALUE equivalents to (setq VAR VALUE)) and later will see how > things will develop. Truth to be told I'm mainly using shiftwidth, > tabstop, showmatch and textwidth and emacs equivalents aren't always > obvious due quite non-uniform interface (vi did this right). > >> Best regards >> Frank > > Regards, > Sanel > > _______________________________________________ > implementations-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
