On 12/31/13, Frank Fischer wrote: > Evil only binds to `redo` not to any specific undo-tree function > (undo-tree remaps `redo` to `undo-tree-redo` or so). This function is > also available from other packages, i.e. `redo` or `redo+` (IIRC the > latter is preferable nowadays, available from Emacswiki). AFAIK no > `redo` function is available in plain Emacs. > > However, if `undo-tree` is available Evil will load it. This is > questionable, of course.
Thanks for explaining it. Still wrapping around my head Emacs default undo/redo system, so I was thinking, does it make sense to make 'redo' behaves like default Emacs version, when undo-tree-mode was disabled? If I got it right, 'redo' will be the same as 'undo'? > Frank Best, Sanel _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
