On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Frank Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.05.2014 17:46, schrieb Stefan Monnier: >> I remember asking this a few years ago, but somehow I can't seem to find >> the answer. So here it is again: I think it would be great to include >> Evil in the GNU ELPA archive. >> >> Would Evil's maintainers be interested in doing so? If yes, then please >> get in touch with me, so we can work out the details (which mostly have >> to do with copyright paperwork, since we have the same policy for GNU >> ELPA as for Emacs, to make it easy to move code between the two).
> Well, I do not know of Vegard (I have not heard from him for some time > now, but he contributed most parts of Evil), but for me it's ok. > However, I do not really know anything about that legal stuff (neither > what has to be done nor what its legal consequences are). And I do not > know if all contributors agree, of course. I don’t know whether my minor contribution of the initial code for evil-digraph.el would make me a contributor, but I’m all for it. I’d gladly complete the paperwork, should it be necessary. > Furthermore, I suppose that most people use the git version of Evil (via > melpa), so I'm not sure how important a GNU ELPA package would be. But > if there is some interest in providing one I'm willing to do so. I would appreciate a stable version in ELPA. _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
