I'm doing a terrible job trying to reply to this from my phone. I'll give you some concrete examples of conflicts at the joins once I am back at a real computer later today.
Eric On Aug 9, 2013 10:45 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > since there is no information then about how those two relate. > > Can you expand on this? > > > http://twitter.com/lxbarth > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Eric Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > > It doesn't move any nodes that anyone else has moved. The tricky part is > the edges where one point has been moved and TIGER wants to move an > adjacent point, since there is no information then about how those two > relate. > > Eric > On Aug 9, 2013 10:22 AM, "Alex Barth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> What that means is that we can create a metric of OSM activity in an >>> area, and by doing that, decide whether or not the area should have an >>> automated import process, or a manual review process. >>> >> >> Ccorrect me if I'm wrong (eric fischer) - isn't that what the automated >> script inherently does by only touching nodes that haven't been touched by >> contributors? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Imports-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us >> >>
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
