Paul Norman <[email protected]> writes: >> and to replace the source tag value with the official name >> of the data set used for the import: "MassGIS Data - Building >> Footprints (2-D, from 2002 LiDAR data)". > > Is the official name what is most meaningful to mappers? Would something > short like source=MassGIS Building Footprints be better?
I think the point of the longer form is that there are multiple datasets From muliiple observation sources, and to distinguish among them. (Basically there is an older dataset from lidar that is only near boston, and a newer dataset from orthophotos that is statewide.)
pgpnxDSaPbOYN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
