I'll be posting our OSM file for "review" hopefully this week. During the last import meeting (that we attended), we agreed that editing would occur offline, and we'd post the file. It's taken a bit longer, than I hoped, though! Summer is a busy time for us!
This, I'm sure, can be addressed at that time. I'm changing all of the police station tags to reflect the new approved tag. From: Bryce Nesbitt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 10:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Talk-us-nps] Tagging the nodes of building outlines with various amenities (import question) In looking casually at the nps mapping, I've seen an odd (to me) pattern of tagging building outline nodes with the amenities of the building. Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/222046130/history Now this works great to control rendering: if you want to get multiple icons this is what you'd do. In the above case we have: building=yes name=Cades Ranger Station nps:verified=yes - information=office nps:verified=yes tourism=information - amenity=police name=Cades Visitor Center nps:verified=yes Instead of tagging everything on the way: amenity=police/ranger_station name=Cades Ranger Station name_1=Cades Visitor Center building=yes tourism=information toilets=yes toilets:wheelchair=yes nps:verified=yes Same pattern occurs at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets?bbox=-83.77652030978699%2C35. 603029810945%2C-83.77543401513596%2C35.60394902282223 Where we have a retail, toilets and fast_food on various nodes. Thoughts on this tagging style?
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
