I'll toss the translation file up on the page. I'll also put the last
shapefile where I started cleaning everything up on there also - didn't
think about that but it would make sense.
I shouldn't have tried adding address info to the sheds - didn't even
think about it.
I'll add those to my notes and start checking them off as I get those
completed.
Thanks much - this is making for a good check list.
Randy
On 12/08/2013 08:23 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Randal Hale [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2013 12:21 PM
To: Imports US
Subject: [Imports-us] Union County Original Data and OSM files
I placed two links here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Import_for_Union_County_Georgia
Thanks for the files.
I had a look primarily at the and had a few comments
- The tags are addr:housenumber, addr:street, etc, not address:*
- Housenumbers with a letter (e.g. "143 a") have a space and are
lower-case. This might be correct, but you should check, I've seen a lot
more "143A" in the field.
- You're probably going to have to filter out every housenumber not
beginning with a number, they all appear to be notes. "burned down"
should probably be used to indicate manual checking is required, of the
two occurances in the sample, one doesn't correspond to anything on the
ground and the other shows a ruin. demolished:building would be my
guess, but I'm not a tagging expert on those. - You're going to have to
do some cleanup on the street tag. <null> <null> is the most obvious
- Besides Dr, Mtn, E and Rdg are also unexpanded
- I happened across these street values that seemed odd and should be
checked: "Z 28 Dr", "E.a.s.t. Point", "Davis Dr (fannin)"
- Buildings on FS roads and numbered highways don't have a street
tagged. Probably a source data issue, but worth noting.
- Are you selecting building=* values from an explicit list and falling
back to building=yes for unknown values?
- Don't add address tags to objects that don't have one in the data.
Right now every shed has them, even if it doesn't have a housenumber or
street.
- The building in building errors are definitely from the source data.
There are also some geometry errors with self-intersecting buildings,
etc. I can't see that these can be fixed automatically. The best
approach would be getting them to clean up the geometry and building in
building errors in their data. I could generate a list of OBJECTIDs
which are involved in errors if it would help.
Overall I'd say it looks reasonable for a first review. As the maintainer of
ogr2osm I'd be interested in looking at the translation file used.
--
-----------------
Randal Hale, GISP
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
twitter:rjhale
http://about.me/rjhale
_______________________________________________
Imports-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
