From: Clifford Snow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:16 PM To: imports; Imports US Subject: [Imports] Completion of King County Address Import
> Another difference is dropping the tag source=King County GIS. Instead > we are including a source:addr:id = SITEID, where SITEID is a unique id > used by King County to manage addresses. While an address could be used > as a id since they should be unique, King County uses the identifier > when an address changes. For example, if an road name is changed, the > SITEID would remain the same. Currently no process exists to update > based on this field, but we feel that at some point, a need will arise > to create such a process. Many people, including myself, have included such tags. To my knowledge, no one has ever used them. Given that you don't have a process for updating, how does this plan differ? > We plan to conduct training during the upcoming #Editathon. Given that this is a week away, you'll probably need to do this training without any actual importing, or use the dev server. Additional feedback based on the wiki: - You state that "We plan to follow & update the plan found at import checklist". This probably has been done and that sentence needs revising. - I suggest the tags import=yes, source= King County GIS (or similar) and not kingcountyaddrimport=yes for changeset tags - The AWS S3 link is broken, showing a hello world page, so I can't review the OSM XML you've posted _______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
