On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Beej Jorgensen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Updated links:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bend_Parks_Import_Plan
>
> http://beej.us/osm/bend_parks_import/bprd_parks_2014_import_v2.osm
>
> How's that looking?
>

I like dropping the parks department tags.

Only real issue might be that some of the parks polygons have the same
name. For example, Riley Ranch Nature Reserve, Shevlin Conservation
Easement, and Simpson Site could be made into multipolygons.  But since
coping multipolygons in JOSM from one layer to another is problematic, I'd
fix them once they were copied.

The Bend Parks Department apparently does park boundaries like mine. If
there is a road running through the park, they do not include it in the
park. For example The Eastgate Natural Area in the Southeast part of the
city. I'm known to make it one large park since that is how people on the
ground view it. If the road is major thoroughfare it makes sense to break
it into polygons, but Eastgate Natural Area has both residential and
tertiary roads so I'd probably leave it as is.

Clifford


-- 
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________
Imports-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us

Reply via email to