On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Clifford Snow <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> The buildings and addresses are in separate changesets by the same user. > > > > > > Serge, > > Do you know if any attempts have been made to contact the user and if > they > > responded? It looks like the user hasn't been active in over a year. > > "Contact the user" is generally a first step when reporting an issue > to DWG. So, I'm guessing that yes, Serge knows, but it is none of our > business. :-) > > I presume that the original reporter, and or DWG did so, and that the > response indicated that the user will not be part of the solution. A > user not being part of the solution might indicate any one or more of > the following: > - no response > - email bounce or other communication failure > - response, but no longer interested in OSM > - response, but insufficient technical abilities to participate > > None of these is necessarily an indictment of the user. Things > happen. Looks like DWG is just moving towards improvement of the > OpenStreetMap data, and matters regarding the user are not relevant. > > Now, if the user was out of contact and is now contributing under a > new email and screen name, perhaps they will join in. :-) You're making a lot of presumptions about a process that isn't defined anywhere. Clifford's question is perfectly valid and I'd love to see more details about contact attempts from Serge and/or DWG.
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
