On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <[email protected]>wrote:
> Scott Atwood wrote: > > How do people go about evaluating the quality of data that is being > considered for import? I'm not sure there is a better source for US > National Park boundaries than the NPS itself. It's not like it's possible > to survey the boundaries by observations on the ground. The only way I was > able to even determine that the previous import was problematic is that > places I knew to be just inside the park boundaries appeared just outside > the imported park boundaries. > > this data isn't much better either. It may be good for some parks. if you > can verify the data is good then import. > I don't mean to belabor the point, but how do people typically evaluate the quality of data that is essentially nothing more than imaginary lines on a map? -Scott -- Scott Atwood The hill isn't in the way, it is the way.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
