On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Guertin <[email protected]> wrote: > My question, then, is whether this is normal. Do other files have > multilinestrings like this, and would benefit from changing the default > handling--or is this file just poorly made, and should be fixed in > file-specific translation routines? Conversely, do other files have > multilinestrings that should be turned into relations, and would be > harmed by changing the default handling?
The vast majority of the time, using the current tagging standards, MultiLineStrings shouldn't be converted to relations, and we should use Paul's approach. The only widespread exception could be type=route, but even then I doubt this would be helpful for mapping data that is to be imported/conflated with OSM since we still tag member ways (and even though some data is overlapped between the relation and the way, the concepts are different). Perhaps in the future our tools and model will improve to support this kind of structure, but we're not there now. Definitely make it possible to create relations from MultiLineStrings, but by default apply tags to member ways. -Josh _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
