The legal requirements are met by listing in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors
Some people believe that a source tag is not necessary on the ways if it is present on the changeset. I am not sure about this myself, a source tag on the way is sometimes useful and sometimes not. If you do use a source tag on the ways Id suggest source=CLC 2006 although Im sure there are other potential values. As the source tag is for mappers it should be something helpful to them. From: László Csatlós [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 2:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Imports] Fwd: Hungarian CLC import Yes, you're right about the source label. Could you explain, what would be the best way? Maybe a copyright notice at the Hungarian CLC import wiki page? CLC:code is not necessary at all, so I will ask the others about that. 2012/11/3 Paul Norman <[email protected]> I believe the opinion of the LWG is that a source tag cannot be used to satisfy a legal requirement. Keep in mind that source tags are routinely stripped from the database by many tools (e.g. osm2pgsql). There are no required tags that are legally required. Because only 311 maps to landuse=forest+wood=deciduous the CLC:code duplicates the tagging. Is it not possible to then remove CLC:code?
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
