Hi, CC-BY license says that users need to follow the specific way in which the right holder asks to do the attribution. I am aware of a large Piedmonte database under CC-BY which specifically requires attribution ON THE MAP ITSELF (i.e. on the derived map), something OSM does not comply with. I believe I am talking about the same Piedmonte database as mentioned by Maurizio. I suggest further checks. Mayeul
Le samedi 24 novembre 2012 à 14:17 +0100, Maurizio Daniele a écrit : > Il 23/11/2012 18:41, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > For cc0 the case should be clear, and also cc-by would AFAIK comply > > with our current terms (as long as you cite them correctly, rumours > > go that a mention in the wiki would be sufficient). A problem might > > be if the active contributors decided in the future to move to an > > even more open license (e.g. cc0) in which case the cc-by data would > > not comply any more to the license and would have to be removed > > (probably together with what has been built upon). The more data > > with cc-by we import, the less free we are to decide to go PD / > > cc0. > > Hello Martin, > > In any case we've got plenty of CC-BY data due to current, so I think > it's not a bigger problem to add more. > > > So I wouldn't consider this an automated import, maybe as long as > > you survey everything nor even an import at all (you are not copying > > but retracing by hand = there is also a kind of verification / > > judgement). cheers, Martin > > Yes, there are also some data available as shp files (under CC0) we > can import directly without redrawing, but most of them are available > only on WMS servers > > -- > Maurizio > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
