William Morris wrote:
Thanks all,
And many apologies; I think I sent an old copy of the file that had been
previously-cached. I have run the JOSM validator on the complete
building set and removed the multipolygon weirdness, including the
overlaps Andrew noticed. I also orthogonalized the full set, though this
required manual revision of some buildings.
I did a test import of about 40 buildings at this location (my own
neighborhood):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.51239&lon=-73.24811&zoom=17&layers=M
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.51239&lon=-73.24811&zoom=17&layers=M>
Let me know if there are any objections to me proceeding with the entire
city. Thanks to everyone for your input!
-Bill
----------
William Morris
Cartographer
(802)-870-0880
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Twitter: @vtcraghead
GeoSprocket LLC, Burlington VT
www.geosprocket.com <http://www.geosprocket.com/>
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
Good morning, Bill
The test import looks pretty good, but I have some questions:
There are buildings having more details than others: adjacent smaller
parts of buildings (garages ?, terraces, ...), the contours of other
buildings are simple rectangles, but on the bing image their contours
are more complex. Whats the reason for this ? Reconstruction of the
buildings ?
The positioning of the buildings look very good. The displacement of
buildings and highways compared to bing imagery seems to be ok.
If you like, I can offer time to help for postprocessing the import.
Tell me, how I can contribute.
WernerP
--
MUSICIANS do it rhythmically
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
