Looks I like barged straight to the committee boat and now I need to do my
720 turns :-)

Here is what I've done so far:

1) Reverted all my previous submissions ( see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14592984 )
2) Updated
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NOAA_ENC_Direct_to_GIS_Import#Data_Transformation_Results
with
the information I can scramble.
3) Posted the OSM file for the SF bay area for your review (
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B9P5wHCK7tHnTEpMMURnLXhaZG8 ).

Would greatly appreciate your feedback.

-- Sailor Jerry



On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Malcolm Herring <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 09/01/2013 21:38, Sailor Jerry wrote:
>
>> Any suggestions and concerns are greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
> I can see many errors in the data structure and tagging. You will see a
> lot of peculiar rendering as a result. It is not a good idea to let a new
> tool loose on the OSM database before it is debugged. A much better
> approach is to save your output to local OSM files & publish these so that
> they can be reviewed and errors brought to your attention.
>
> If you need such input, all of us at OpenSeaMap will gladly give you such
> help. There is a mailing list on SF.net: openseamap-devel@lists.**
> sourceforge.net <[email protected]> (also hosted on
> Gmane at: gmane.comp.gis.openseamap.**devel)
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm (OSM User:Malcolmh)
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Imports mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/imports<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports>
>
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

Reply via email to