Indeed we do. Generally speaking, we can improve the QA tools available to the editing community as a whole, as well as the methods used to provide feedback to editors. As an example, QA tools might be run across changesets and, when errors are detected, the editor notified and provided a list of features with associated errors.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Richard Welty <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2/16/13 9:27 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote: > >> Users Adam Dunn >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/**user/Adam%20Dunn<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Adam%20Dunn> >> ), >> alester_imports >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/**user/alester_imports<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alester_imports> >> ), >> and azubimport >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/**user/azubimport<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/azubimport>) >> are >> duplicating way geometry from multiple sources, in some cases within a few >> days of each other. >> >> maybe we need to start talking about the importance of good QA planning > for imports... spotting duplicate imports should part of such planning. > > richard > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/imports<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports> > -- John Novak 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676) http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnanovak/ OSM ID:oldtopos OSM Heat Map: http://yosmhm.neis-one.org/?oldtopos OSM Edit Stats:http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?oldtopos
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
