Hi, New comment inline below in this thread.
Sincerely, Severin Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:54:08 -0300 > From: S?verin MENARD <[email protected]> > To: Paul Norman <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Imports] Import of UNICEF health facilities data for > Central African Republic > Message-ID: > <CA+y5pBKt8kU791X6DYH=UY_pshmkAcPeVXZ= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Hi Paul, > > Thank you very much for your answer. My comments inline > > > > > The WRI data is more complicated, and you might want to consider doing > the > > UNICEF import before it. > > > Definitely. The data is generally too inaccurate to be imported (eg > 300-1000m for the roads from the reality provided by the high res Bing > imagery), but can be used as a guide for tracing > Actually we would like to be sure if only used as a guide with sometimes some attributes (eg name) copy and paste on the freshly-new-traced vector data from Bing imager, it is not considered as an import. > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > **- **The license is stated as CC-BY-SA 2.0 in one place and > > ODbL 1.0 / DbCL 1.0 in another**** > > > > **- **There are more layers on the WRI site than listed on the > > wiki page. It would be good to be clear about what is and is not being > > considered for import**** > > > > **- **There isn?t a license on the WRI page**** > > > > **- **You mention having the users delete the undesired > > attributes at > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_CAR_WRI_Data#Workflow. You > > should do this as part of the data conversion.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I haven?t looked at the data itself yet, but in both cases the types of > > objects proposed are useful ones (health facilities, schools, water, > roads > > and other basic features)**** > > > > ** ** > > >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
